United States Supreme Court holds that breach of seal does not require dismissal of qui tam

Published on: December 6th, 2016


Supreme Court Ruling Strengthens Whistleblower Protections in Qui Tam Cases

In a unanimous decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled in State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. U.S. ex rel. Rigsby that a seal breach in a qui tam lawsuit does not automatically require dismissal of the case. This landmark ruling directly rejected arguments made by government contractors and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, affirming that trial courts have discretion to determine the appropriate remedy when a case’s seal is violated.

Major Victory for Whistleblowers

The decision is a significant win for individuals pursuing qui tam lawsuits under the False Claims Act, reinforcing that technical seal violations cannot be used by defendants as an automatic escape from liability. The Supreme Court’s opinion strengthens the integrity of the whistleblower lawsuit process by prioritizing the merits of the case over procedural missteps.

Seal Breach Doesn’t End Qui Tam Lawsuit

This ruling ensures that a qui tam lawsuit will not be dismissed solely due to a seal breach—protecting whistleblower rights and encouraging insiders to come forward with information about fraud against the government. It represents a major step forward in supporting whistleblower protections and holding wrongdoers accountable.

Click here for the Court’s opinion.

Report Fraud at No Cost

If you have information about fraudulent practices, contact our office for a free, confidential consultation:

This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice.